WASHINGTON – Even
after all the disclosures, all the tears, all the talk of
bribes and prostitutes and fancy cars, there was something
unexpectedly jarring about the latest development in the
tawdry spectacle that is the Randy “Duke” Cunningham
congressional corruption case.
It would seem that any questions about that corruption
were settled when the former congressman departed for
federal prison last year. But some were still unable to
fully grasp the extent of the corruption and believed that
this Vietnam hero was at least partially a victim of
unscrupulous Washington operators.
But no more; not after the FBI's 11-page summary of
prison interviews with Cunningham earlier this year; and
not after a 75-page affidavit filed by the FBI that detail
the depths of the corruption and the ways that Cunningham
personally orchestrated the bribes and made demands upon
demands of the contractors willing to pay him to steer
federal money their way.

Both documents were obtained last week by Copley News
Service and detailed in Wednesday's San Diego
Union-Tribune.
One who read the story was a Carlsbad man who worked
under Cunningham in the Navy, a longtime admirer who had
been clinging to the faint hope that the corruption was
not truly deep-seated.
That hope died for Tom Reid as he carefully read the
FBI documents available through the Union-Tribune
Web site. “Those two documents hit me like a ton of
bricks,” he said.
Reid, who retired from the Navy in 1995 after a career
that included a stint at the Pentagon working for the
Joint Chiefs of Staff, served at Miramar Naval Air
Station, where Cunningham was his superior officer.
He was reluctant to accept Cunningham's corruption
until he read of the documents and interview.
“I was sickened, appalled, disappointed,” Reid said.
“Oh man, the details really brought it home.”
The longtime Republican congressman from Rancho Santa
Fe is serving an eight-year, four-month sentence after
admitting to accepting more than $2.4 million in bribes.
He pleaded guilty to charges of conspiracy and tax
evasion.
Reid said when the scandal unfolded in 2005 he was
stunned but said, “I'll just reserve judgment 'til there
are more facts because it's hard for me to believe that
Duke would have changed this much. But now there's no more
questions after reading these documents.”
In Washington, the new documents also had an impact
last week.
“It's breathtaking to imagine that we had a guy who was
so corrupt to his bones,” said Norman J. Ornstein, an
expert on Congress at the American Enterprise Institute
and author of books on Congress.
“These documents show that there was almost a
zealousness about the notion that, boy, he had found a
gravy train and he was going to ride that gravy train
right off into the sunset.”
Ornstein said the disclosures put pressure on Congress
to revive an ethics committee that fell into disuse.
“This takes us back to some of the problems when . . .
you decide you are going to abandon any ethics process.
This is the result,” Ornstein said. “This is a cautionary
note as they look to fixing the ethics process right now.”